AnubisvsReadMeABook
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Anubis | ReadMeABook | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 78 in Security | #3 of 15 in Audiobook Management |
| GitHub stars | 23 802 | 1 033 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 151 | +63 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 21 |
| Latest release | v1.28.2 · 23 Oct 2026 | v1.2.12 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Anubis scores 80/100 against 64/100 for ReadMeABook, so it is the safer default.
ReadMeABook ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for Anubis.
If you want the quickest setup, Anubis is easier to run; ReadMeABook needs more configuration.
Anubis is growing faster right now (+1 151 stars in 30 days).
Anubis details →ReadMeABook details →
Swap a project
Keep Anubis, compare it with
Keep ReadMeABook, compare it with