AnubisvsPostgREST
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Anubis | PostgREST | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 79/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 78 in Security | #2 of 13 in API |
| GitHub stars | 23 789 | 27 734 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 138 | +57 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 20 |
| Latest release | v1.28.2 · 23 Oct 2026 | v16.5 · 18 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Haskell |
Which one should you pick?
Anubis scores 80/100 against 79/100 for PostgREST, so it is the safer default.
PostgREST ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for Anubis.
If you want the quickest setup, PostgREST is easier to run; Anubis needs more configuration.
Anubis is growing faster right now (+1 138 stars in 30 days).
Anubis details →PostgREST details →
Swap a project
Keep Anubis, compare it with
Keep PostgREST, compare it with