AnonymousOverflowvsPuter
Two self-hosted Web Application projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| AnonymousOverflow | Puter | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 47/100 | 80/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 6 in Web Application | #1 of 6 in Web Application |
| GitHub stars | 381 | 43 966 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +379 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 19 |
| Latest release | v1.14.1 · 25 Aug 2026 | 26.10.1 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MPL-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Puter scores 80/100 against 47/100 for AnonymousOverflow, so it is the safer default.
Puter ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for AnonymousOverflow.
If you want the quickest setup, AnonymousOverflow is easier to run; Puter needs more configuration.
Puter is growing faster right now (+379 stars in 30 days).
AnonymousOverflow details →Puter details →All Web Application projects →
Swap a project
Keep AnonymousOverflow, compare it with
Keep Puter, compare it with