AListvsMikroDash
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| AList | MikroDash | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 34 in File Management | #27 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 50 373 | 633 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +150 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 11 |
| Latest release | v3.66.0 · 21 Oct 2026 | v0.8.78 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Go |
Which one should you pick?
AList scores 83/100 against 49/100 for MikroDash, so it is the safer default.
AList ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for MikroDash.
If you want the quickest setup, MikroDash is easier to run; AList needs more configuration.
AList is growing faster right now (+150 stars in 30 days).
AList details →MikroDash details →
Swap a project
Keep AList, compare it with
Keep MikroDash, compare it with