AiSOCvsisms-builder
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| AiSOC | isms-builder | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 78 in Security | #6 of 8 in Compliance |
| GitHub stars | 5 315 | 257 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 947 | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 40 | 15 |
| Latest release | v20.4.0 · 31 Oct 2026 | v1.81.2 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
AiSOC scores 79/100 against 45/100 for isms-builder, so it is the safer default.
AiSOC ships more often: 40 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for isms-builder.
If you want the quickest setup, isms-builder is easier to run; AiSOC needs more configuration.
AiSOC is growing faster right now (+2 947 stars in 30 days).
AiSOC details →isms-builder details →
Swap a project
Keep AiSOC, compare it with
Keep isms-builder, compare it with