AiSOCvsDeepSeek Harness
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| AiSOC | DeepSeek Harness | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 78 in Security | #3 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 4 850 | 264 775 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 486 | +8 783 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 38 | 0 |
| Latest release | v20.2.1 · 28 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 79/100 for AiSOC, so it is the safer default.
AiSOC ships more often: 38 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for DeepSeek Harness.
If you want the quickest setup, DeepSeek Harness is easier to run; AiSOC needs more configuration.
DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+8 783 stars in 30 days).
AiSOC details →DeepSeek Harness details →
Swap a project
Keep AiSOC, compare it with
Keep DeepSeek Harness, compare it with