airbytevsnocodb
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| airbyte | nocodb | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 3 in Data Engineering | #1 of 4 in No-code Platforms |
| GitHub stars | 22 285 | 65 377 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +151 | +315 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 16 |
| Latest release | — | 2026.10.1 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
nocodb scores 81/100 against 75/100 for airbyte, so it is the safer default.
nocodb ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for airbyte.
If you want the quickest setup, nocodb is easier to run; airbyte needs more configuration.
nocodb is growing faster right now (+315 stars in 30 days).
airbyte details →nocodb details →
Swap a project
Keep airbyte, compare it with
Keep nocodb, compare it with