airbytevsNavidrome Music Server
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| airbyte | Navidrome Music Server | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 79/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 3 in Data Engineering | #2 of 54 in Media Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 22 285 | 24 424 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +151 | +649 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 15 |
| Latest release | — | v0.64.2 · 23 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Other | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Navidrome Music Server scores 79/100 against 75/100 for airbyte, so it is the safer default.
Navidrome Music Server ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for airbyte.
If you want the quickest setup, Navidrome Music Server is easier to run; airbyte needs more configuration.
Navidrome Music Server is growing faster right now (+649 stars in 30 days).
airbyte details →Navidrome Music Server details →
Swap a project
Keep airbyte, compare it with
Keep Navidrome Music Server, compare it with