AfilmoryvsChronoFrame
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Afilmory | ChronoFrame | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 53/100 | 63/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 19 in Photo Galleries | #8 of 41 in Photo Management |
| GitHub stars | 2 662 | 1 964 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +4 | +32 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 3 |
| Latest release | — | v1.0.2 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
ChronoFrame scores 63/100 against 53/100 for Afilmory, so it is the safer default.
ChronoFrame ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Afilmory.
If you want the quickest setup, ChronoFrame is easier to run; Afilmory needs more configuration.
ChronoFrame is growing faster right now (+32 stars in 30 days).
Afilmory details →ChronoFrame details →
Swap a project
Keep Afilmory, compare it with
Keep ChronoFrame, compare it with