ChronoFramevsImmich Kiosk
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ChronoFrame | Immich Kiosk | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 62/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 41 in Photo Management | #2 of 19 in Photo Galleries |
| GitHub stars | 1 964 | 1 733 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +32 | +41 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 24 |
| Latest release | v1.0.2 · 21 Oct 2026 | v0.45.2 · 22 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
ChronoFrame scores 63/100 against 62/100 for Immich Kiosk, so it is the safer default.
Immich Kiosk ships more often: 24 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for ChronoFrame.
If you want the quickest setup, ChronoFrame is easier to run; Immich Kiosk needs more configuration.
ChronoFrame details →Immich Kiosk details →
Swap a project
Keep ChronoFrame, compare it with
Keep Immich Kiosk, compare it with