AFFiNE Community Editionvsurl-to-png
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| AFFiNE Community Edition | url-to-png | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 42 in Knowledge Management | #13 of 16 in Web Scraping |
| GitHub stars | 73 940 | 256 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 026 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 4 | 2 |
| Latest release | v0.27.4 · 17 Aug 2026 | v2.1.4 · 18 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
AFFiNE Community Edition scores 83/100 against 49/100 for url-to-png, so it is the safer default.
AFFiNE Community Edition ships more often: 4 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for url-to-png.
If you want the quickest setup, url-to-png is easier to run; AFFiNE Community Edition needs more configuration.
AFFiNE Community Edition is growing faster right now (+1 026 stars in 30 days).
AFFiNE Community Edition details →url-to-png details →
Swap a project
Keep AFFiNE Community Edition, compare it with
Keep url-to-png, compare it with