AdGuard HomevsHass-MCP
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| AdGuard Home | Hass-MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 41 in DNS | #63 of 104 in Home Automation |
| GitHub stars | 37 821 | 351 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +762 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 9 |
| Latest release | v1.0.0-b.1 · 30 Sept 2026 | v0.6.1 · 24 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
AdGuard Home scores 84/100 against 50/100 for Hass-MCP, so it is the safer default.
AdGuard Home ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for Hass-MCP.
AdGuard Home is growing faster right now (+762 stars in 30 days).
AdGuard Home details →Hass-MCP details →
Swap a project
Keep AdGuard Home, compare it with
Keep Hass-MCP, compare it with