ActualvsopenGym
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Actual | openGym | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 62 in Personal Finance | #1 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 29 838 | 17 158 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +702 | +2 989 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 12 |
| Latest release | v26.10.0 · 2 Oct 2026 | v1.4.3 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
Actual and openGym score the same (81/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.
Actual ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for openGym.
If you want the quickest setup, openGym is easier to run; Actual needs more configuration.
openGym is growing faster right now (+2 989 stars in 30 days).
Actual details →openGym details →
Swap a project
Keep Actual, compare it with
Keep openGym, compare it with