ActivityWatchvsTradingAgents
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ActivityWatch | TradingAgents | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 11 in Time Tracking | #3 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 19 429 | 118 239 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +453 | +5 880 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 11 |
| Latest release | v0.14.1 · 10 Oct 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MPL-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
TradingAgents scores 87/100 against 80/100 for ActivityWatch, so it is the safer default.
ActivityWatch ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for TradingAgents.
TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 880 stars in 30 days).
ActivityWatch details →TradingAgents details →
Swap a project
Keep ActivityWatch, compare it with
Keep TradingAgents, compare it with