ActivityWatchvsSure
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ActivityWatch | Sure | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 74/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 11 in Time Tracking | #4 of 62 in Personal Finance |
| GitHub stars | 19 414 | 10 713 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +438 | +681 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 15 |
| Latest release | v0.14.1 · 10 Oct 2026 | v0.7.5-hotfix.3 · 24 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MPL-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Ruby |
Which one should you pick?
ActivityWatch scores 80/100 against 74/100 for Sure, so it is the safer default.
Sure ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for ActivityWatch.
If you want the quickest setup, Sure is easier to run; ActivityWatch needs more configuration.
ActivityWatch details →Sure details →
Swap a project
Keep ActivityWatch, compare it with
Keep Sure, compare it with