ActivityWatchvssupabase
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ActivityWatch | supabase | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 92/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 11 in Time Tracking | #1 of 40 in Database Management |
| GitHub stars | 19 421 | 114 288 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +445 | +3 540 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 8 |
| Latest release | v0.14.1 · 10 Oct 2026 | v1.26.08 · 7 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MPL-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
supabase scores 92/100 against 80/100 for ActivityWatch, so it is the safer default.
ActivityWatch ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for supabase.
If you want the quickest setup, ActivityWatch is easier to run; supabase needs more configuration.
supabase is growing faster right now (+3 540 stars in 30 days).
ActivityWatch details →supabase details →
Swap a project
Keep ActivityWatch, compare it with
Keep supabase, compare it with