ActivityWatchvsStash
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ActivityWatch | Stash | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 78/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 11 in Time Tracking | #2 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 19 418 | 13 309 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +442 | +299 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 7 |
| Latest release | v0.14.1 · 10 Oct 2026 | latest_develop · 24 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MPL-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
ActivityWatch scores 80/100 against 78/100 for Stash, so it is the safer default.
ActivityWatch ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Stash.
If you want the quickest setup, Stash is easier to run; ActivityWatch needs more configuration.
ActivityWatch details →Stash details →
Swap a project
Keep ActivityWatch, compare it with
Keep Stash, compare it with