ActivityWatchvsSparkyFitness
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ActivityWatch | SparkyFitness | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 11 in Time Tracking | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 19 418 | 6 503 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +442 | +392 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 27 |
| Latest release | v0.14.1 · 10 Oct 2026 | v1.10.0 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MPL-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
ActivityWatch scores 80/100 against 66/100 for SparkyFitness, so it is the safer default.
SparkyFitness ships more often: 27 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for ActivityWatch.
ActivityWatch details →SparkyFitness details →
Swap a project
Keep ActivityWatch, compare it with
Keep SparkyFitness, compare it with