ActivityWatchvsSeaweedFS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ActivityWatch | SeaweedFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 11 in Time Tracking | #1 of 11 in Cloud Storage |
| GitHub stars | 19 429 | 35 812 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +453 | +851 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 28 |
| Latest release | v0.14.1 · 10 Oct 2026 | 4.51 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MPL-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
SeaweedFS scores 81/100 against 80/100 for ActivityWatch, so it is the safer default.
SeaweedFS ships more often: 28 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for ActivityWatch.
ActivityWatch details →SeaweedFS details →
Swap a project
Keep ActivityWatch, compare it with
Keep SeaweedFS, compare it with