ActivityWatchvsqdrant
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ActivityWatch | qdrant | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 11 in Time Tracking | #1 of 5 in Vector Database |
| GitHub stars | 19 421 | 35 307 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +445 | +504 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 14 |
| Latest release | v0.14.1 · 10 Oct 2026 | v1.20.0 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MPL-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
qdrant scores 82/100 against 80/100 for ActivityWatch, so it is the safer default.
qdrant ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for ActivityWatch.
ActivityWatch details →qdrant details →
Swap a project
Keep ActivityWatch, compare it with
Keep qdrant, compare it with