ActivityWatchvsPixelFed
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ActivityWatch | PixelFed | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 11 in Time Tracking | #12 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums |
| GitHub stars | 19 429 | 7 131 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +453 | +24 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 15 |
| Latest release | v0.14.1 · 10 Oct 2026 | v0.15.2 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MPL-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | PHP |
Which one should you pick?
ActivityWatch scores 80/100 against 64/100 for PixelFed, so it is the safer default.
PixelFed ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for ActivityWatch.
If you want the quickest setup, ActivityWatch is easier to run; PixelFed needs more configuration.
ActivityWatch is growing faster right now (+453 stars in 30 days).
ActivityWatch details →PixelFed details →
Swap a project
Keep ActivityWatch, compare it with
Keep PixelFed, compare it with