ActivityWatchvsPiik
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ActivityWatch | Piik | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 11 in Time Tracking | #1 of 4 in Live Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 19 429 | 3 889 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +453 | +431 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 14 |
| Latest release | v0.14.1 · 10 Oct 2026 | v2.5.0 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
ActivityWatch scores 80/100 against 73/100 for Piik, so it is the safer default.
Piik ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for ActivityWatch.
If you want the quickest setup, Piik is easier to run; ActivityWatch needs more configuration.
ActivityWatch details →Piik details →
Swap a project
Keep ActivityWatch, compare it with
Keep Piik, compare it with