ActivityWatchvsPhotoPrism
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ActivityWatch | PhotoPrism | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 11 in Time Tracking | #4 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 19 429 | 40 370 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +453 | +135 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 7 |
| Latest release | v0.14.1 · 10 Oct 2026 | 261007-65faaae5d · 7 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MPL-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
ActivityWatch scores 80/100 against 76/100 for PhotoPrism, so it is the safer default.
ActivityWatch ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for PhotoPrism.
ActivityWatch is growing faster right now (+453 stars in 30 days).
ActivityWatch details →PhotoPrism details →
Swap a project
Keep ActivityWatch, compare it with
Keep PhotoPrism, compare it with