Activepiecesvswoodpecker-ci
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Activepieces | woodpecker-ci | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #5 of 28 in CI/CD |
| GitHub stars | 25 264 | 8 065 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +564 | +157 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 37 | 11 |
| Latest release | 0.92.3-hotfix.2 · 28 Oct 2026 | v3.20.0 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Activepieces scores 81/100 against 73/100 for woodpecker-ci, so it is the safer default.
Activepieces ships more often: 37 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for woodpecker-ci.
If you want the quickest setup, Activepieces is easier to run; woodpecker-ci needs more configuration.
Activepieces is growing faster right now (+564 stars in 30 days).
Activepieces details →woodpecker-ci details →
Swap a project
Keep Activepieces, compare it with
Keep woodpecker-ci, compare it with