ActivepiecesvsWazuh
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Activepieces | Wazuh | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 80/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #4 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 25 264 | 17 476 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +564 | +491 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 36 | 9 |
| Latest release | 0.90.4-hotfix.1 · 28 Oct 2026 | v4.14.9 · 14 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | C++ |
Which one should you pick?
Activepieces scores 81/100 against 80/100 for Wazuh, so it is the safer default.
Activepieces ships more often: 36 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for Wazuh.
If you want the quickest setup, Activepieces is easier to run; Wazuh needs more configuration.
Activepieces details →Wazuh details →
Swap a project
Keep Activepieces, compare it with
Keep Wazuh, compare it with