ActivepiecesvsTradingAgents
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Activepieces | TradingAgents | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #3 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 25 264 | 117 816 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +564 | +5 457 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 36 | 11 |
| Latest release | 0.90.4-hotfix.1 · 28 Oct 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
TradingAgents scores 87/100 against 81/100 for Activepieces, so it is the safer default.
Activepieces ships more often: 36 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for TradingAgents.
If you want the quickest setup, Activepieces is easier to run; TradingAgents needs more configuration.
TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 457 stars in 30 days).
Activepieces details →TradingAgents details →
Swap a project
Keep Activepieces, compare it with
Keep TradingAgents, compare it with