Apache AirflowvsTradingAgents
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Apache Airflow | TradingAgents | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #4 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 47 294 | 117 613 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +337 | +5 254 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 11 |
| Latest release | providers-ydb/2.6.1 · 13 Oct 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
TradingAgents scores 86/100 against 84/100 for Apache Airflow, so it is the safer default.
TradingAgents ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Apache Airflow.
If you want the quickest setup, TradingAgents is easier to run; Apache Airflow needs more configuration.
TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 254 stars in 30 days).
Apache Airflow details →TradingAgents details →