ActivepiecesvsSyncWatch同步观影
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Activepieces | SyncWatch同步观影 | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 46/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #24 of 36 in Video Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 25 269 | 140 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +550 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 40 | 10 |
| Latest release | 0.87.3-hotfix.1 · 29 Oct 2026 | v2.4.4 · 6 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
Activepieces scores 80/100 against 46/100 for SyncWatch同步观影, so it is the safer default.
Activepieces ships more often: 40 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for SyncWatch同步观影.
If you want the quickest setup, Activepieces is easier to run; SyncWatch同步观影 needs more configuration.
Activepieces is growing faster right now (+550 stars in 30 days).
Activepieces details →SyncWatch同步观影 details →