ActivepiecesvsSpeedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Activepieces | Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 33/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #46 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 25 265 | 144 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +565 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 37 | 0 |
| Latest release | 0.92.3-hotfix.2 · 28 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | — |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Activepieces scores 81/100 against 33/100 for Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana, so it is the safer default.
Activepieces ships more often: 37 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana.
Activepieces is growing faster right now (+565 stars in 30 days).
Activepieces details →Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana details →
Swap a project
Keep Activepieces, compare it with
Keep Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana, compare it with