Activepiecesvsrpi-mqtt-monitor
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Activepieces | rpi-mqtt-monitor | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #58 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 25 264 | 328 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +564 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 37 | 8 |
| Latest release | 0.92.3-hotfix.2 · 28 Oct 2026 | 1.4.3 · 18 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Activepieces scores 81/100 against 51/100 for rpi-mqtt-monitor, so it is the safer default.
Activepieces ships more often: 37 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for rpi-mqtt-monitor.
If you want the quickest setup, Activepieces is easier to run; rpi-mqtt-monitor needs more configuration.
Activepieces is growing faster right now (+564 stars in 30 days).
Activepieces details →rpi-mqtt-monitor details →
Swap a project
Keep Activepieces, compare it with
Keep rpi-mqtt-monitor, compare it with