ActivepiecesvsRequest Tracker
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Activepieces | Request Tracker | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 65/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #3 of 9 in Helpdesk |
| GitHub stars | 25 273 | 1 164 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +554 | +5 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 40 | 2 |
| Latest release | 0.87.3-hotfix.1 · 29 Oct 2026 | rt-5.0.10 · 1 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Perl |
Which one should you pick?
Activepieces scores 80/100 against 65/100 for Request Tracker, so it is the safer default.
Activepieces ships more often: 40 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Request Tracker.
If you want the quickest setup, Activepieces is easier to run; Request Tracker needs more configuration.
Activepieces is growing faster right now (+554 stars in 30 days).
Activepieces details →Request Tracker details →