ActivepiecesvsPrint Farm Manager
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Activepieces | Print Farm Manager | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #17 of 22 in 3D Printing |
| GitHub stars | 25 266 | 215 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +547 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 40 | 1 |
| Latest release | 0.87.3-hotfix.1 · 29 Oct 2026 | v1.0.0 · 2 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
Activepieces scores 80/100 against 47/100 for Print Farm Manager, so it is the safer default.
Activepieces ships more often: 40 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Print Farm Manager.
If you want the quickest setup, Activepieces is easier to run; Print Farm Manager needs more configuration.
Activepieces is growing faster right now (+547 stars in 30 days).
Activepieces details →Print Farm Manager details →