activemqvsOrca
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| activemq | Orca | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 91/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 12 in Message Broker | #1 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 2 462 | 108 958 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +9 051 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 24 | 15 |
| Latest release | activemq-5.19.12 · 22 Oct 2026 | v1.4.243 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Java | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Orca scores 91/100 against 64/100 for activemq, so it is the safer default.
activemq ships more often: 24 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for Orca.
If you want the quickest setup, Orca is easier to run; activemq needs more configuration.
Orca is growing faster right now (+9 051 stars in 30 days).
activemq details →Orca details →
Swap a project
Keep activemq, compare it with
Keep Orca, compare it with