activemqvsNode RED
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| activemq | Node RED | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 12 in Message Broker | #1 of 26 in Automation |
| GitHub stars | 2 462 | 23 790 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +108 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 24 | 21 |
| Latest release | activemq-5.19.12 · 22 Oct 2026 | 4.1.17 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Java | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
Node RED scores 81/100 against 64/100 for activemq, so it is the safer default.
activemq ships more often: 24 stable releases in the past year, against 21 for Node RED.
If you want the quickest setup, Node RED is easier to run; activemq needs more configuration.
Node RED is growing faster right now (+108 stars in 30 days).
activemq details →Node RED details →
Swap a project
Keep activemq, compare it with
Keep Node RED, compare it with