actions-runner-controllervsMikroDash
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| actions-runner-controller | MikroDash | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 28 in CI/CD | #27 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 6 619 | 633 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +101 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 10 |
| Latest release | gha-runner-scale-set-0.15.1 · 23 Oct 2026 | v0.8.77 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Go |
Which one should you pick?
actions-runner-controller scores 71/100 against 49/100 for MikroDash, so it is the safer default.
MikroDash ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for actions-runner-controller.
If you want the quickest setup, MikroDash is easier to run; actions-runner-controller needs more configuration.
actions-runner-controller is growing faster right now (+101 stars in 30 days).
actions-runner-controller details →MikroDash details →