ACE-StepvsUpptime
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ACE-Step | Upptime | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #13 of 125 in AI | #3 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 14 151 | 17 184 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 283 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.1.8 · 18 May 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Markdown |
Which one should you pick?
ACE-Step scores 77/100 against 69/100 for Upptime, so it is the safer default.
ACE-Step ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Upptime.
If you want the quickest setup, Upptime is easier to run; ACE-Step needs more configuration.
ACE-Step is growing faster right now (+1 283 stars in 30 days).
ACE-Step details →Upptime details →
Swap a project
Keep ACE-Step, compare it with
Keep Upptime, compare it with