ACE-StepvsSeaweedFS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ACE-Step | SeaweedFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #13 of 125 in AI | #1 of 11 in Cloud Storage |
| GitHub stars | 14 148 | 35 794 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 291 | +869 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 28 |
| Latest release | v0.1.8 · 18 May 2026 | 4.51 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
SeaweedFS scores 81/100 against 77/100 for ACE-Step, so it is the safer default.
SeaweedFS ships more often: 28 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for ACE-Step.
ACE-Step details →SeaweedFS details →
Swap a project
Keep ACE-Step, compare it with
Keep SeaweedFS, compare it with