ACE-StepvsMediaMTX
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ACE-Step | MediaMTX | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 79/100 |
| Rank in category | #13 of 125 in AI | #3 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 14 140 | 20 537 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 283 | +301 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 18 |
| Latest release | v0.1.8 · 18 May 2026 | v1.21.3 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
MediaMTX scores 79/100 against 77/100 for ACE-Step, so it is the safer default.
MediaMTX ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for ACE-Step.
If you want the quickest setup, MediaMTX is easier to run; ACE-Step needs more configuration.
ACE-Step is growing faster right now (+1 283 stars in 30 days).
ACE-Step details →MediaMTX details →
Swap a project
Keep ACE-Step, compare it with
Keep MediaMTX, compare it with