ACE-Stepvslivekit
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ACE-Step | livekit | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 80/100 |
| Rank in category | #13 of 125 in AI | #2 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 14 140 | 21 897 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 283 | +822 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 19 |
| Latest release | v0.1.8 · 18 May 2026 | v1.13.11 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
livekit scores 80/100 against 77/100 for ACE-Step, so it is the safer default.
livekit ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for ACE-Step.
If you want the quickest setup, ACE-Step is easier to run; livekit needs more configuration.
ACE-Step details →livekit details →
Swap a project
Keep ACE-Step, compare it with
Keep livekit, compare it with