abs-kosync-bridgevsRequest Tracker
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| abs-kosync-bridge | Request Tracker | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 57/100 | 65/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #3 of 9 in Helpdesk |
| GitHub stars | 551 | 1 164 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +5 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 | 2 |
| Latest release | v7.11.0 · 26 Oct 2026 | rt-5.0.10 · 1 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Perl |
Which one should you pick?
Request Tracker scores 65/100 against 57/100 for abs-kosync-bridge, so it is the safer default.
abs-kosync-bridge ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Request Tracker.
If you want the quickest setup, abs-kosync-bridge is easier to run; Request Tracker needs more configuration.
Request Tracker is growing faster right now (+5 stars in 30 days).
abs-kosync-bridge details →Request Tracker details →
Swap a project
Keep abs-kosync-bridge, compare it with
Keep Request Tracker, compare it with