abs-kosync-bridgevsRemoteTerm for MeshCore
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| abs-kosync-bridge | RemoteTerm for MeshCore | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 57/100 | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #4 of 4 in Amateur Radio |
| GitHub stars | 551 | 338 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 | 10 |
| Latest release | v7.11.0 · 26 Oct 2026 | 3.17.1 · 26 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
abs-kosync-bridge scores 57/100 against 45/100 for RemoteTerm for MeshCore, so it is the safer default.
abs-kosync-bridge ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for RemoteTerm for MeshCore.
If you want the quickest setup, abs-kosync-bridge is easier to run; RemoteTerm for MeshCore needs more configuration.
abs-kosync-bridge details →RemoteTerm for MeshCore details →
Swap a project
Keep abs-kosync-bridge, compare it with
Keep RemoteTerm for MeshCore, compare it with