abs-kosync-bridgevsIncus
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| abs-kosync-bridge | Incus | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 57/100 | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #3 of 44 in Container Management |
| GitHub stars | 550 | 6 516 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +276 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 | 16 |
| Latest release | v7.11.0 · 26 Oct 2026 | v7.0.2 · 16 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Incus scores 75/100 against 57/100 for abs-kosync-bridge, so it is the safer default.
abs-kosync-bridge ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 16 for Incus.
If you want the quickest setup, abs-kosync-bridge is easier to run; Incus needs more configuration.
Incus is growing faster right now (+276 stars in 30 days).
abs-kosync-bridge details →Incus details →
Swap a project
Keep abs-kosync-bridge, compare it with
Keep Incus, compare it with