Zabbixvszookeeper
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Zabbix | zookeeper | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #13 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #1 of 8 in Configuration Management |
| GitHub stars | 6 518 | 12 826 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +107 | +16 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go Template | Java |
Which one should you pick?
Zabbix scores 75/100 against 73/100 for zookeeper, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, zookeeper is easier to run; Zabbix needs more configuration.
Zabbix is growing faster right now (+107 stars in 30 days).
Zabbix details →zookeeper details →
Swap a project
Keep Zabbix, compare it with
Keep zookeeper, compare it with