wyoming-openwakewordvsZabbix
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| wyoming-openwakeword | Zabbix | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 45/100 | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 11 in Voice Assistants | #13 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 207 | 6 521 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +109 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 0 |
| Latest release | v2.1.0 · 30 Oct 2025 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go Template |
Which one should you pick?
Zabbix scores 75/100 against 45/100 for wyoming-openwakeword, so it is the safer default.
wyoming-openwakeword ships more often: 1 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zabbix.
If you want the quickest setup, wyoming-openwakeword is easier to run; Zabbix needs more configuration.
Zabbix is growing faster right now (+109 stars in 30 days).
wyoming-openwakeword details →Zabbix details →
Swap a project
Keep wyoming-openwakeword, compare it with
Keep Zabbix, compare it with