# World Monitor vs Zammad

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | World Monitor | Zammad |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 ✓ | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #1 of 9 in Helpdesk |
| GitHub stars | 89 739 ✓ | 6 052 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 400 ✓ | +100 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v2.11.6 · 25 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Ruby |

## Which one should you pick?

World Monitor scores 86/100 against 70/100 for Zammad, so it is the safer default.

World Monitor ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zammad.

World Monitor is growing faster right now (+2 400 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [World Monitor](https://selfhost.directory/project/world-monitor) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/world-monitor.md)
- [Zammad](https://selfhost.directory/project/zammad) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zammad.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/world-monitor-vs-zammad