# World Monitor vs 心潮动态心智系统

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | World Monitor | 心潮动态心智系统 |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 ✓ | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #146 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 89 742 ✓ | 218 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 403 ✓ | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | v2.11.6 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2.6.0 · 4 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

World Monitor scores 86/100 against 44/100 for 心潮动态心智系统, so it is the safer default.

World Monitor ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for 心潮动态心智系统.

If you want the quickest setup, 心潮动态心智系统 is easier to run; World Monitor needs more configuration.

World Monitor is growing faster right now (+2 403 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [World Monitor](https://selfhost.directory/project/world-monitor) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/world-monitor.md)
- [心潮动态心智系统](https://selfhost.directory/project/xinchao-dynamic-mind) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/xinchao-dynamic-mind.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/world-monitor-vs-xinchao-dynamic-mind