# World Monitor vs Xibo CMS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | World Monitor | Xibo CMS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 ✓ | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #2 of 7 in Digital Signage |
| GitHub stars | 89 721 ✓ | 517 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 382 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 ✓ | 7 |
| Latest release | v2.11.6 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ | 4.5.5 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

World Monitor scores 86/100 against 59/100 for Xibo CMS, so it is the safer default.

World Monitor ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Xibo CMS.

If you want the quickest setup, Xibo CMS is easier to run; World Monitor needs more configuration.

World Monitor is growing faster right now (+2 382 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [World Monitor](https://selfhost.directory/project/world-monitor) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/world-monitor.md)
- [Xibo CMS](https://selfhost.directory/project/xibo-cms) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/xibo-cms.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/world-monitor-vs-xibo-cms