# Workout.cool vs zookeeper

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Workout.cool | zookeeper |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 66/100 | 73/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker | #1 of 8 in Configuration Management |
| GitHub stars | 8 654 | 12 825 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +155 ✓ | +14 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.3.2 · 7 Dec 2025 | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

zookeeper scores 73/100 against 66/100 for Workout.cool, so it is the safer default.

Workout.cool ships more often: 1 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for zookeeper.

If you want the quickest setup, Workout.cool is easier to run; zookeeper needs more configuration.

Workout.cool is growing faster right now (+155 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Workout.cool](https://selfhost.directory/project/workout-cool) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/workout-cool.md)
- [zookeeper](https://selfhost.directory/project/zookeeper) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zookeeper.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/workout-cool-vs-zookeeper