# Workout.cool vs zoneless

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Workout.cool | zoneless |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 66/100 ✓ | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker | #4 of 10 in E-commerce |
| GitHub stars | 8 654 ✓ | 574 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +155 ✓ | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 1 |
| Latest release | v1.3.2 · 7 Dec 2025 | v0.1.0 · 23 Mar 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Workout.cool scores 66/100 against 50/100 for zoneless, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, Workout.cool is easier to run; zoneless needs more configuration.

Workout.cool is growing faster right now (+155 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Workout.cool](https://selfhost.directory/project/workout-cool) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/workout-cool.md)
- [zoneless](https://selfhost.directory/project/zoneless) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zoneless.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/workout-cool-vs-zoneless