# Workout.cool vs Zero-K

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Workout.cool | Zero-K |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 66/100 ✓ | 62/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker | #2 of 23 in Gaming |
| GitHub stars | 8 654 ✓ | 877 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +155 ✓ | +26 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.3.2 · 7 Dec 2025 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Lua |

## Which one should you pick?

Workout.cool scores 66/100 against 62/100 for Zero-K, so it is the safer default.

Workout.cool ships more often: 1 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zero-K.

Workout.cool is growing faster right now (+155 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Workout.cool](https://selfhost.directory/project/workout-cool) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/workout-cool.md)
- [Zero-K](https://selfhost.directory/project/zero-k) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zero-k.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/workout-cool-vs-zero-k